DATA-DRIVEN ASSESSMENT PROVIDES MISSING LINK IN CAR BUYING EXPERIENCE

February 03, 2014

Life-cycle Assessment of 1,300 Models Reveals Best of 2014


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
4 February 2014 [Santa Rosa, CA] – The Automotive Science Group (ASG) conducted a comprehensive life-cycle assessment of over 1,300 automobiles across nine categories to distinguish the BEST model year 2014 vehicles in environmental, economic, social and “all-around” performance. Auto consumers are now equipped with a car buying guide founded on principled facts, a departure from the notoriously subjective test drive “editor reviews” that have long been the industry norm.

Using a unique combination of vehicle data inputs that include conventional specifications as well as ground-breaking social, environmental and economic performance indicators, ASG’s back-end algorithms are wildly complex, but the front-end results – meaningful vehicle ratings and distinguished awards – are forthright and consumer-friendly.

ASG’s Automotive Performance Index is for automotive consumers what Google is for web users. Google presents the best of the web to users based on their data-driven page rank technologies. Likewise, ASG optimizes the automotive consumer search using proprietary algorithms and data-driven analysis to ensure the best vehicles are identified and differentiated in the highly competitive marketplace.

Consumers can now prioritize vehicle choices based on ethical and/or budgetary objectives. Whether it’s a commitment to buy American-made, an environmental prerogative to reduce one’s carbon footprint, or purely an economic choice to save thousands of dollars in fuel costs, ASG’s vehicle ratings are the guidepost for the 21st Century car buyer.

“We believe our Index is the market differentiator for today’s hyper-competitive automotive marketplace,” says Colby Self, Managing Director of the Automotive Science Group. “Based on the principles of ecological economics, we have developed a comparative automotive assessment that recognizes corporate social responsibility efforts that ultimately lead to the best end-products for the market while remaining financially relevant to mainstream consumers.”

ASG’s 2014 study found the 2014 Mitsubishi Mirage to hold the smallest life-cycle environmental footprint of any conventionally powered model year 2014 automobile available in the North American market (with minimum four person occupancy). With an EPA estimated 40 MPG combined and a material composition weighing less than 2,000 lbs, the life-cycle assessment – from extraction of natural resources, through manufacturing, distribution, estimated life miles driven with fuel inputs, to end-of-life processing and recovery – identifies the Mirage as an example of how conventional vehicles can reduce environmental impacts while delivering cars that are competitive in the market.

Looking to advanced automotive technologies, ASG’s 2014 study found the Nissan Leaf to hold the smallest life-cycle environmental footprint of any model year 2014 automobile available in the North American market (with minimum four person occupancy). This U.S. assembled, battery electric vehicle with an estimated 84 mile driving range is the best selling all-electric car in the world for good reason, and now consumers can be confident that the increased environmental impacts of manufacturing the battery electric technology is more than offset with increased environmental performance during operational life. While the electricity mix of the U.S. grid varies by region, the average mix in 2014 provides an energy source for the Nissan Leaf that is environmentally beneficial. Looking forward, energy forecasts identify a cleaner electricity mix across the U.S. grid, further increasing the environmental benefits of electric technologies in future years.

From an economic standpoint, the 2014 Chevrolet Spark was revealed to have the lowest cost of ownership over a five-year economic forecast, taking into account purchase and operating costs of all model year 2014 automobiles available in the North American market (with minimum four person occupancy).

And finally, from a social performance perspective – considering the rights of those charged with vehicle manufacture and assembly – the BMW Group and Nissan both produced award-winning vehicles in multiple classes, demonstrating sound corporate social responsibility initiatives.

The Best of 2014 selections and award winners in all nine vehicle classes are listed in the attached 2014 Automotive Performance Index, and available on our site at zsefg.jocyn.tk. For more information, contact:


Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.


Also in NOTEWORTHY

FORD KNOWS TRUCKS
FORD KNOWS TRUCKS

July 11, 2019

ASG released its truck findings today from the 2019 Automotive Performance Index (API) study, with the All-New Ford Ranger and Ford F-150 topping the index in both the mid and full-size truck segments. Ford's focus on trucks is paying dividends.

Read More

REASONS FOR OPTIMISM IN THE EVOLVING AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR
REASONS FOR OPTIMISM IN THE EVOLVING AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR

June 05, 2019

ASG’S annual study found 37 electrified models - 15 full battery electric vehicles and 22 plug-in hybrid vehicles - up from just 8 production models in 2018. 2019 marks a momentous turning point where the most advanced powertrains are not only available to mainstream buyers, but according to ASG’s comparative analysis, some of these models also bridge exceptional environmental performance with industry leading economic performance and best all-around life-cycle value.

Read More

TOYOTA PRIUS COMES OF AGE - NOW IN ITS PRIME
TOYOTA PRIUS COMES OF AGE - NOW IN ITS PRIME

May 31, 2018

ASG released findings today from its annual Automotive Performance Index (API) study, with the Toyota Prius Prime topping the index, and earning ASG’s Best All-Around Performance title. In the 18th year since the Prius was introduced to the North American market – the Prius has finally come of age.

Read More

RELATIVE RATING METHOD

The Automotive Performance Index (API) applies statistical methods to demonstrate each vehicle rating in relative comparison. For example, the vehicle that performs highest in environment performance in a given class obtains a rating score of 100. Each vehicle in its class is then compared relative to the top-performing vehicle with a rating score reflecting the statistical difference in performance outcomes. A score of 91 translates to a 9% environmental performance deficit as compared to the top-performing vehicle.  

Due to the API’s relative vehicle rating method, vehicle class divisions were identified as a critical input - these class divisions are detailed here.

While the Automotive Performance Index is indeed an exhaustive list of vehicles to trim level detail, with each vehicle assessment reporting over 200 unique data outputs (the culmination of thousands of data inputs), ASG has taken additional measures to ease the burden of sorting through all data points and all vehicle assessments. We have developed key performance categories and sorted all vehicles in each class according to Environmental Performance, Social Performance, Economic Performance and All-Around Performance. The vehicle in each class with the best score in each unique category is named the performance award winner (i.e. Best Environmental Performance Award winner). The vehicle in each class that scores highest combined scores in Environmental Performance, Social Performance and Economic Performance is named the ASG Best All-Around Performance Award winner.

One step further, we also name the Best 5 All-Around Performance Award winners in each class to provide consumers with a concise product comparison guide.